To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I see it differently. People just use more mobile devices which complement desktop usage. They aren't substituting one for the other completely though. So Android and iOS aren't pulling the user base from Windows because of its inferiority, rather because there is some balance shift between desktop and mobile form factors now. But it's not a replacement. I.e. when it balances out, there still remains a question of replacing the desktop Windows with better desktop alternative (such as Linux).
Edited 2012-11-11 21:34 UTC
No, They don't die by bullets, only fire.
That's what a monopoly is, people whether they like it or not, have to buy their stuff.
Unless Android moves to the desktop (I know a lot of people who would like that) it's unlikely anything will replace Windows.
Of course they could always take back that jack*** from Nokia and put him in Ballmer's shoes. Nothing burns hotter and brighter than greed fueled by stupidity.
Personally I don't see Android as a mature and high quality system, let alone don't see any good for it to move to desktop. It enjoys its success in the mobile sphere because it came in the right time, not because it's technically superior to possible mobile alternatives. I.e. regular desktop Linux as well as mobile one is technically superior to Android. Having Android spread into desktop and becoming "Windows #2" will not be pleasant. It's enough that it creates problems in the mobile already.
That aside, Windows desktop domination is already slowly deteriorating to other desktop alternatives (without considering any mobile shifts). It's just not rapid, but a slow process.
Edited 2012-11-11 21:36 UTC





Member since:
2010-06-08
Microsoft has an uncanny ability to live and retain the market domination through constant acts of shooting itself. Well, sooner or later it should have an effect?
Edited 2012-11-11 18:25 UTC