Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 10th Nov 2012 00:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542048
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-22
They do seem to log at least one thing: the link in the search result you click on.
This is what Google does too, it is to see if what people clicked on to move the more popular higher.
And possibly log other things, probably not very user specific though.
However they could log per IP-address and browser string too which can be very specific.
It's still a big improvement above Google of course:
They don't communicate a referer to the site you visit (because of HTTPS) and they don't have a free analytics service for websites which tracks movement on websites, or own 2 ad-services and or an embedded free video service. And no Facebook-button competitor and no free enbeddable Javascript-libraries and fonts- service for webdevelopers.