Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 11th Nov 2012 15:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542081
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by shmerl
by Morgan on Tue 13th Nov 2012 05:16
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by shmerl"
I think Motorola deserves some credit for the Android adoption numbers here in the US, due to their huge "Droid" advertising campaign. In the same vein as metonyms like "Kleenex" for tissues, "Coke" for carbonated soft drinks, and "Tylenol" for pain relievers, Android phones of any make are known as "Droids" around here.
RE[6]: Comment by shmerl
by shmerl on Tue 13th Nov 2012 05:49
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by shmerl"





Member since:
2006-02-15
Popularity does not correlate with objective quality. Look e.g. at BetaMax ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betamax ) Android just happen to fill a spot better than the alternatives at the moment -- price, variety of looks and features, and so on.