To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"TOTAL freedom" is self-contradicting.
BSD gives me the freedom to make software proprietary; that's more freedom for corporations, but less for end users, who may be limited in their ability to install on multiple or non-vendor devices, configure their devices as they please, etc.
GPL protects the original software authors from having to compete with derivatives of their own creations and ensures end users control of their computing experience (if they have or can afford the technical expertise), but limits other authors from distributing derivatives under incompatible licenses they might otherwise choose.
Proprietary licenses are remarkably creative (from a legal perspective), and almost always protect the corporate interests first and foremost - but if you like the products a corporation produces, ensuring their profitability is a great way to get more of 'em.
And so on. License choice is an exercise in selecting the optimum compromise for the creator's own wants and needs, including the need for end users to actually adopt his product.
I personally choose GPL for my hobby projects, as I value the end user's rights over corporations and other developers, but I also buy commercial software at times and carefully adhere to their license of choice.
Bottom line - "TOTAL freedom" is a philosophical rally cry, but doesn't mean much in reality. Life is compromise; deal and move on.





Member since:
2007-11-23
BSD doesn't redefine word "free". It just estabilishes freedom to use software however you want. Ergo: it gives you a TOTAL freedom.
Researchers SHARE their work and that's what they supposed to do in education, which is - surprise, surprise - about learning, research, sharing discoveries, etc. I think you are deeply wrong on this subject.
Ritchie and Thompson did their greates things against their own employer, he didn't even know they were working on the particular stuff. He just gave them much more freedom, because it was research.
I didn't try to perpetrate anything, so keep that utter stuff for yourself. This is how you overlooked and misunderstood the things I said.