To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You sadly have to blame the market somewhat, too. The number of "I don't buy apps" people I've come across is far more numerous than those that do. So while I too would prefer to shell out at least a few bucks to avoid adware, developers and publishers see me as the minority case.
Of course, I already get a bit leery about app stores. As a frequent user of open source software, I get a little antsy when I read the list of permissions apps want and know that no independent review has ever or can ever be done to ensure the app isn't abusing its allowances.
I agree. I'd love to see clearer up front descriptions about the app in the Marketplaces.
At least on Windows this metadata is already available (for Advertising and In app Purchasing) so you can get a lot more descriptive than they currently are
"This app is paid + includes in app purchasing." or "This app is free + includes in app advertising"
Also, I'd love for a clear description on what upgrading from Trial does. This should be a hard requirement.




Member since:
2005-11-13
Ya, pretty much. For me, rather than having a super-curated app store, I'd rather have one that is honest about whether the app is REALLY free or not.
Honestly, I don't mind paying for apps, but I hate downloading apps marked free, only to find that they're infected with adware, or you have to make an in-app purchase to get the full functionality. If it costs money, then just make me pay for the f**king thing up front, with a free trial preferable.
Point being, I blame app store vendors for a lot of this.