Linked by Howard Fosdick on Tue 13th Nov 2012 06:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542340
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution"
by WereCatf on Tue 13th Nov 2012 16:40
in reply to "RE: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution""
But it's perfect for a headless file/email/printserver! The Cubie has SATA, whoohoo!! I would want a case around my Cubie that's more than a screwed-on piece of plexy glass...
IMHO the Cubie seems the most well-rounded box of the ones mentioned here, partly exactly because it sports a real SATA-port. That alone gives it a nice performance-boost and increases its capabilities. I also like the fact that there are SPD/IF headers on the board for digital audio. According to their QA the system will also support real suspend and resume under Linux.
RE[3]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution"
by renox on Wed 14th Nov 2012 14:32
in reply to "RE[2]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution""
IMHO the Cubie seems the most well-rounded box of the ones mentioned here, partly exactly because it sports a real SATA-port. That alone gives it a nice performance-boost and increases its capabilities.
Yes, but one thing that I'm not so sure is about its Ethernet performance, AFAIK the Raspberry Pi has issues also on this point as it is "Ethernet over USB" internally..





Member since:
2005-07-08
But it's perfect for a headless file/email/printserver! The Cubie has SATA, whoohoo!! I would want a case around my Cubie that's more than a screwed-on piece of plexy glass...