Linked by Howard Fosdick on Tue 13th Nov 2012 06:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542345
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution"
by renox on Wed 14th Nov 2012 14:32
in reply to "RE[2]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution""
IMHO the Cubie seems the most well-rounded box of the ones mentioned here, partly exactly because it sports a real SATA-port. That alone gives it a nice performance-boost and increases its capabilities.
Yes, but one thing that I'm not so sure is about its Ethernet performance, AFAIK the Raspberry Pi has issues also on this point as it is "Ethernet over USB" internally..
RE[4]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution"
by WereCatf on Wed 14th Nov 2012 15:03
in reply to "RE[3]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution""
Yes, but one thing that I'm not so sure is about its Ethernet performance, AFAIK the Raspberry Pi has issues also on this point as it is "Ethernet over USB" internally..
The Allwinner A10 used by the Cubie has Ethernet-controller built-in, it's not a USB-based device. It's 10/100, though, they're planning to do a 10/100/1000 - version in the future.
http://cubieboard.org/about/





Member since:
2006-02-15
IMHO the Cubie seems the most well-rounded box of the ones mentioned here, partly exactly because it sports a real SATA-port. That alone gives it a nice performance-boost and increases its capabilities. I also like the fact that there are SPD/IF headers on the board for digital audio. According to their QA the system will also support real suspend and resume under Linux.