Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th Nov 2012 00:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542347
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
They can try to buy themselves time with things like Android app compatibility, but people don't really want that, that's stupid.
Why would consumers not want that? Interoperability would even the paying field somewhat. It may be bad for RIM's ecosystem but it could inflate sales. I'm not saying that it would save RIM but it could keep them alive in the short term.




Member since:
2005-11-29
This is the same dilemma Nokia faced with MeeGo, and ultimately why they decided to drop MeeGo.
It is notoriously hard to bootstrap an ecosystem. Nokia, like RIM, had almost no chance to do that. (Someone will probably reply to this with "But, but QT!!!" and to them I kindly recommend shutting the fuck up, but anyway)
I really am trying hard to find a scenario in my head where this plays out favorably for RIM but nothing I see implies anything other than a multi-year catch up.
RIM doesn't have a developer platform with 1/10th the polish of the other ecosystems, it doesn't have an ecosystem with even hints of promise (I don't care about app counts, but developer momentum is decidedly lacking) and it will be time consuming and expensive for them to organically grow one.
They can try to buy themselves time with things like Android app compatibility, but people don't really want that, that's stupid.
RIM is burning cash, losing time, and coincidentally those two are key ingredients for growing an ecosystem, which they lack.
Blackberry 10 is dead on arrival. I've written it off completely.