Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th Nov 2012 16:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542361
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Also worth noting:
by ze_jerkface on Tue 13th Nov 2012 18:01
in reply to "RE: Also worth noting:"
You can thank Sinofsky for that.
He avoided these types of questions on his blog.
He's basically a tech trendster who thinks anything older than 5 years should be deprecated.
His unexplained hostility to Silverlight caused irreparable damage with the Windows developer community. Overnight Microsoft went from promoting Silverlight conferences to deleting questions about where it fits in with WindowsRT. Sinofsky is clueless and hates being questioned, I'm totally ecstatic to see him leave.
RE[3]: Also worth noting:
by CapEnt on Wed 14th Nov 2012 09:30
in reply to "RE[2]: Also worth noting:"
RE[2]: Also worth noting:
by moondevil on Wed 14th Nov 2012 08:15
in reply to "RE: Also worth noting:"
RE[3]: Also worth noting:
by ze_jerkface on Thu 15th Nov 2012 06:34
in reply to "RE[2]: Also worth noting:"





Member since:
2005-06-29
There's probably more to it with the whole "Silverlight-goes-dead-overnight" debacle. I still don't understand why we don't have access to DotNet apps on WinRT.