To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Windows 8 is a POS.
Windows 7 was Vista with an additional service pack. It was more of a marketing scheme to deal with the negative public perception as seen in the Mojave experiment.
Vista was released buggy but was fixed by SP1. However Vista hatred was still popular and most people respond to crowd opinion rather than data.
Windows 7 is not a crowning achievement and Sinofsky's "Windows convergence" plan is inane. Sinofsky has also caused serious damage to the remaining trust between developers and Microsoft. The guy is an overhyped hack and it just took Ballmer a while to figure it out.
This is still the first time since the mid to late 90's that MS actually gave a roadmap for releases and delivered on them time and feature wise. I don't like the whole Metro stuff, but I'm impressed that they did it as quickly and smoothly after win 7. Don't mistake admiration for the process for admiration of the products.
Not it isn't. It does soo many things better than 7 on the desktop. While I don't really use the Metro Apps (except for the video player and skype) ... it is a good OS.
Windows XP was a POS at launch. Windows Vista was a right pain in the backside until Service Pack 1 and came 5 years to late.
Win 7 and Win 8 had almost no stability problems in the pre release and beta versions.





Member since:
2006-07-14
I think what he's done is nothing short of remarkable: shipped two versions of windows nearly on time and relatively bug free. Compare/contrast that with the previous windows releases: Win Vista and Win XP. To do that, I'm quite sure he made some enemies who are now free to publicly air their dirty laundry.
It will be interesting to see if MS goes back to its earlier ways without him at the helm.