Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th Nov 2012 15:56 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542366
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I have never used it myself, but what I see in films on youtube reminds me a bit of riscos... especially when you have menus opening within menus within menus...
Nothing like RISCOS at all. I've used both and RISCOS is horrible.
I think in terms of interface riscos HAD one of the best interfaces for its time...
I'll have to disagree. Mac OS 8 was one of the best overall user interfaces, bar the menu being stuck at the top of the screen. RISCOS was ugly, crash prone and the user interface paradigms were very unnatural. The file type system (also a Mac OS feature, also irritating) was stupid. File load/save was horrible. I really hated the RISCOS user interface with a vengeance and I was very glad when RISCOS finally died from the mainstream.
I think when/if heiko becomes beta it will be showing its age before it's really been born.
Why? I don't get why people keep saying this. Because it doesn't have alpha blended compositing and GL rendered windows? Seriously?
Maybe all these niche os developers hould get together and actualy build together an OS that stands a chance of being used by more than a handfull of people. Instead of starting something that will ultimately be left uncompleted
If you really don't understand the motivation and you don't understand the reasoning, I suggest you pack up, cut your losses, delete you OS News account and go home. Geekism is not for you ;-)
Well iot reminds me of riscos... riscos is/was not horrible, but I do find that haiko's interface horrible, especially the short title bars.
I used mac at uni the whole webdesign departemnt had them. I dislike the way it functions, even the new macos lion is not something I like.
Risc os looked great. I never had problems with it. I found the file type system great, never knew theat macos had teh same. What was great was the app folders, the ram disc and system monitor.
Why? I don't get why people keep saying this. Because it doesn't have alpha blended compositing and GL rendered windows? Seriously?
No because of the way it functions and the way it looks. Looks are important we see first with our eyes.
RISCOS was ugly...
Why? I don't get why people keep saying this. Because it doesn't have alpha blended compositing and GL rendered windows? Seriously?
If you really don't understand the motivation and you don't understand the reasoning, I suggest you pack up, cut your losses, delete you OS News account and go home. Geekism is not for you ;-)
Why should I delete my account because I disagree with you and can't see the point in haiko - what a stupid thing to say! Who said I was geek? I come here for the news beacuse I like the site, not because i'm a nerd. I have no smart phone, just have one computer (15" laptop) and don'T use consoles or tablets. But that doesn't stop me coming here. Also not understanding my reasoning is your problem





Member since:
2006-07-01
I have never used it myself, but what I see in films on youtube reminds me a bit of riscos... especially when you have menus opening within menus within menus...
I think in terms of interface riscos HAD one of the best interfaces for its time... but its age now shows. I think when/if heiko becomes beta it will be showing its age before it's really been born.
When I look at what gnome shell looks like and does or macos, or windows 8 I can't see haiku being anything more than something that gets mentioned on sites like this.
Maybe all these niche os developers hould get together and actualy build together an OS that stands a chance of being used by more than a handfull of people. Instead of starting something that will ultimately be left uncompleted
Edited 2012-11-13 18:01 UTC