To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I was actually talking about Windows 8.
Surface RT is a lousy idea as well. A Windows tablet that doesn't run Windows programs at a price higher than Android tablets. Just awful. Oh and a name that confuses consumers to top it off. Sinofsky is a clueless hack and developers were right about him from the beginning.
I think such a "win 8 sucks" generalization is wrong.
Win8 is not one product. Its multiple products. We have Win8 desktop and server, win8 x86 for tablet, win8 RT for tablet and WP8.
Win8 desktop suffers most. It's in a transition-state with modern (Metro) and classic (win7) both in one. Not bad per se but both those desktop UIs are half done. Classic misses classic elements like startmenu. Metro misses proper adaption to desktop.
What will they do with server version?
For the tablet RT suffers most. It has only disadvantages to x86. Its again classic (x86) and modern (RT) again but modern is incompatible.
Then there is WP8. Its only modern (Metro). Its incompatible to classic.
They tried/try to bring all that together but are close away. Most important are a desktop optimized desktop metro, a better classic desktop and a public win32 for ARM API.
Edited 2012-11-13 20:13 UTC





Member since:
2008-09-21
Why hate? There is gray between black and white. Like those that will buy a Surface but prefer win32 compatibility and hence buy Surface x86 rather then Surface RT.
That's the whole deal. Microsoft offers you two near identicial (price, feel, look, name) products. The one runs all those Windows applications out there and allows non-app-market installations, the other not. Why would you buy the later one?
Edited 2012-11-13 18:15 UTC