Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th Nov 2012 15:56 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542371
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: In what sense...
by moondevil on Wed 14th Nov 2012 08:39
in reply to "RE[2]: In what sense..."
RE[4]: In what sense...
by henderson101 on Wed 14th Nov 2012 11:20
in reply to "RE[3]: In what sense..."
That is more co-incidence rather than design. Be didn't go with multimedia right away, and the OS was written almost from the moment the hardware (Hobbit based) was in a position to be used. When the OS was being written, it was Benoit, Bob and Erich... all Macophiles. Erich also worked on Pink, so that has a lot more to do with the direction.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taligent#Pink_and_Blue
RE[3]: In what sense...
by henderson101 on Wed 14th Nov 2012 11:16
in reply to "RE[2]: In what sense..."
An I get down voted for being right? Democracy.. lol.
I know we Europeans find it hard to believe, as Amiga was ubiquitous here - Amiga was fairly niche in the US. It certainly wasn't perceived as a serious machine by many consumers:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Amiga#Amiga_in_the_Unit...




Member since:
2006-05-30
It wasn't really. Amiga was just another OS. Most of the key developers at Be, especially to begin with, were Mac based or ex-Apple. Benoit Schillings, Steve Sakoman, Erich Ringewald and Bob Herold were at any rate. I'll quote myself here: http://www.osnews.com/thread?514205