Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th Nov 2012 15:56 UTC
BeOS & Derivatives Can you believe they've come this far by now? Once known as OpenBeOS, Haiku today announced the release of the fourth alpha for Haiku R1. It seems like only yesterday when BeOS died and OpenBeOS rose form its ashes, generating a new hope among the legions of avid BeOS fans. Now, almost twelve years later, we've hit the fourth alpha.
Thread beginning with comment 542410
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by rain
by zima on Tue 13th Nov 2012 21:33 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by rain"
zima
Member since:
2005-07-06

It's desktop oriented in the sense that its very small dev team targets ~desktops almost exclusively (and it always targeted them, also as BeOS - its web appliances didn't go far, and were almost desktops anyway).

And in the sense that it's otherwise relatively unremarkable - what it would offer for mobile, that would make a tangible difference? (IIRC somebody once said "media handling" ...but present mobile OS do that good enough already)

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Comment by rain
by rain on Tue 13th Nov 2012 21:58 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by rain"
rain Member since:
2005-07-09

It's desktop oriented in the sense that its very small dev team targets ~desktops almost exclusively (and it always targeted them, also as BeOS - its web appliances didn't go far, and were almost desktops anyway).


As I implied earlier, it would have to be done by a dedicated team. I actually think that Be was on the right path with the focus shift, although they were much too early.

And in the sense that it's otherwise relatively unremarkable - what it would offer for mobile, that would make a tangible difference?


Not much really. Except for the fact that it's already a clean and lean little OS that is well suited for the task. Much more so than Linux in my opinion.
But other than that the question would really be "how can we make this different?". I think that there's plenty of room for innovation in that market if you are up to it.

That said, I'm not arguing that it's something that must be done. Just saying if anyone had the desire to make it big, that would pretty much be the only and last chance.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: Comment by rain
by zima on Tue 13th Nov 2012 22:11 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by rain"
zima Member since:
2005-07-06

it's already a clean and lean little OS that is well suited for the task. Much more so than Linux in my opinion.

I don't know ...a variant of Linux is ready - it's actually shipping, and clearly good enough to be massively popular. I'd say that's being far better suited for the task than any hypothetical Haiku offshot. :p

But other than that the question would really be "how can we make this different?". I think that there's plenty of room for innovation in that market if you are up to it.

I think that question isn't ultimately that important, WRT market forces (yes, we can say "unfortunately isn't that important" - but we, those who even know about BeOS or Haiku, hardly matter here). If even Microsoft being the "3rd ecosystem" is not certain, there's much less hope for any smaller players...

I suspect the innovation might happen, from now on, mostly within the established ecosystems - roughly like it was with the PC: look what immense improvements were brought by its economies of scale, in the last 3 decades (meanwhile, all the more ~proprietary or niche platforms died out - even Macs are just PCs underneath, really).
BTW, overlooking that was a major error of Be, with how they self-exiled themselves into ~premium markets (and so x86 port of BeOS came too late, when win95 & 98 already took over)

Reply Parent Score: 2