Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th Nov 2012 22:24 UTC
AMD "Advanced Micro Devices has hired JPMorgan Chase & Co to explore options, which could include a potential sale, as the chipmaker struggles to find a role in an industry increasingly focused on mobile and away from traditional PCs, according to three sources familiar with the situation." Woah. Bad news for competition in the x86 space.
Thread beginning with comment 542436
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Thom
by Brendan on Wed 14th Nov 2012 00:01 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Thom"
Brendan
Member since:
2005-11-16

Hi,

"If AMD were bought out (especially by Intel)


i don't think they could even find a buyer
nobody in their right mind would go headon with intel, and intel can't buy them thanks to some anti-competitive laws
"

Microsoft could buy them, and then start using their CPUs and GPUs in things like Xbox, and then start optimising Windows for their CPUs while optimising their CPUs for Windows. They could ignore any new features Intel creates, and Intel would have to support Microsoft's new features just to maintain market share (while competing against ARM at the same time).

I'm scared.

- Brendan

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[4]: Thom
by shmerl on Wed 14th Nov 2012 01:58 in reply to "RE[3]: Thom"
shmerl Member since:
2010-06-08

That would be awful.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: Thom
by Neolander on Wed 14th Nov 2012 09:50 in reply to "RE[3]: Thom"
Neolander Member since:
2010-03-08

Microsoft could buy them, and then start using their CPUs and GPUs in things like Xbox, and then start optimising Windows for their CPUs while optimising their CPUs for Windows. They could ignore any new features Intel creates, and Intel would have to support Microsoft's new features just to maintain market share (while competing against ARM at the same time).

I'm scared.

- Brendan

Apple have tried many times relying on CPUs from a single manufacturer. It has arguably never worked well on a large scale except with Intel. So why would Microsoft bother?

Their tight control on UEFI sounds much more worrying to me.

Edited 2012-11-14 09:50 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Thom
by Flatland_Spider on Wed 14th Nov 2012 16:24 in reply to "RE[4]: Thom"
Flatland_Spider Member since:
2006-09-01

Apple's CPU suppliers had other businesses besides CPUs, and they weren't as focused as Intel is.

MS and Intel wouldn't have to compete directly. MS could use Intel consultants and fabs. Plus, the two have a long history, so I would expect it to be more of a mutual thing rather than antagonistic.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Thom
by zima on Thu 15th Nov 2012 21:31 in reply to "RE[4]: Thom"
zima Member since:
2005-07-06

Their tight control on UEFI sounds much more worrying to me.

And isn't AMD semi-supportive of OSS alternatives to UEFI? Now, that would be a nice thing for MS to kill off... ;p

Reply Parent Score: 2