To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Arm64 is a nice odd ball. It requires less silicon than its Arm 32 bit relations. Uses less power per core than its 32 bit relations and is faster. Yet it also has backwards compatibility support.
Arm pulled of some nice creative design voodoo with the Arm64 bit design.
Arm64 bit also allows you to probe and find out what soc chip you are in.
I don't know the specific answer to that question. What I do know is that alphas were a generation or two ahead of x86 back in the 90's in terms of performance and they were effectively killed by politics as soon as compaq and HP merged.
Sparcs were better too, but Sun/Oracle have always ben kind of a pain to deal with. But yeah, if Sparcs were doing better than they are now for workstation/desktop class computers I'd feel better.
MIPS? Don't know much about the arch other than its not really around, other than the Chinese processor and in the embedded side everyone seems to be choosing arm over mips.
ARM? I do kind of feel better now that arm is making its way up from the bottom. It will be interesting to see if they can really match x86 on the higher end rather than just being more energy efficient.





Member since:
2006-07-14
I'd be a lot happier if DEC was still cranking out Alphas.