Linked by Howard Fosdick on Tue 13th Nov 2012 06:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542499
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution"
by WereCatf on Wed 14th Nov 2012 12:15
in reply to "RE[2]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution""
Wow, now THAT's big news! There definitely should be an article about this on OSnews, if there hasn't been one already. "
I don't think most people here care. Just look at how little discussion this topic here has generated, and that link is only about the RPi -- an even smaller audience.
I'm somewhat disappointed, I was hoping for some interesting discussion here, or even just pointers to good Pandaboard-like devices with SATA and actually functional software.
RE[3]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution"
by renox on Wed 14th Nov 2012 14:37
in reply to "RE[2]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution""
Wow, now THAT's big news! "
That depends on your POV, the driver is just an 'RPC shim' to a companion CPU which runs the "real" driver, so
-from a maintenance POV this is useless
-from a licensing POV 100% of the code running on the ARM CPU is Free which is a big news indeed.
RE[4]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution"
by Neolander on Wed 14th Nov 2012 16:10
in reply to "RE[3]: Low-footprint, low-power "revolution""
That depends on your POV, the driver is just an 'RPC shim' to a companion CPU which runs the "real" driver, so
-from a maintenance POV this is useless
-from a licensing POV 100% of the code running on the ARM CPU is Free which is a big news indeed.
-from a maintenance POV this is useless
-from a licensing POV 100% of the code running on the ARM CPU is Free which is a big news indeed.
Let me see if I get this right...
-GPU firmware is closed-source
-Driver is open-source, the communication protocol with the firmware is open-specced, and it is possible to implement an OSS OpenGL stack
Is that the way it works? If so, isn't it a big win already for OSS drivers developers?





Member since:
2010-03-08
Wow, now THAT's big news! There definitely should be an article about this on OSnews, if there hasn't been one already.