Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th Nov 2012 22:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542539
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2012-06-22
AMD is always one step behind Intel when it comes to efficiency. Intel invests heavily into R&D and a buyer like Apple would have to ramp up R&D to match which isn't something that could happen overnight even if they were willing to spend the money.
It would be less of an issue for a company looking to build full server stacks with proprietary extensions or simply to put "works best with Oracle cpus" on the box. But AMD has a red balance sheet and I'm not sure how much of their losses could be cut by selling off unneeded divisions.