Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th Nov 2012 23:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542651
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Although it has been resolved...
by Soulbender on Fri 16th Nov 2012 01:41
in reply to "RE: Although it has been resolved... "
RE[3]: Although it has been resolved...
by zima on Wed 21st Nov 2012 17:30
in reply to "RE[2]: Although it has been resolved... "
IRL it tends to get even more nuanced than the scenario mentioned by danger_nakamura (plus he might be looking at the past through slightly rose-tinted glasses), also when we don't care much for douchebags... reminded me about two posts I made elsewhere not too long ago
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2481754&cid=37885152
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2481754&cid=37915274




Member since:
2011-06-21
Vox populi. Don't be nervous.
When those involved won't name an individual, often for good reasons, other people are still going to try and guess. The potential for error is actually created by those that remain silent, even though they may have good reasons for doing so. Since we don't have actual lynch mobs (mostly) anymore any case of mistaken identity can be worked through.
When people hear a story of a person being a douchebag it is natural to want to know who it is. I think modern society does too much to protect the privacy of anti-social individuals. If they were subject to the full backlash against their actions they would likely learn and self-correct quickly - look what happened here.
And the world would be a better place. Except for douchebags - but I'm supposed to care about their plight?