Linked by Howard Fosdick on Fri 16th Nov 2012 07:43 UTC
Windows A California man is suing Microsoft, alledging that his Surface tablet did not provide the advertised amount of disk space. The 32G device has 16G of space for users, as the operating system uses the other 16G. The 64G Surface leaves 45G free for users. The case will turn on whether Microsoft has clearly explained to customers how much free space the Surface leaves for their use outside of the OS. How much disk space does your OS consume?
Thread beginning with comment 542840
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by ilovebeer
by ilovebeer on Sat 17th Nov 2012 01:19 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by ilovebeer"
ilovebeer
Member since:
2011-08-08

Everyone else advertises their devices 16, 32 64 GB devices, Microsoft advertised 32GB of storage space, which means that is what is available to use. Using the words "storage space" changes everything.

No, ...it doesn't. The device DOES have 32GB of storage. Part of it is used by the OS. Just like every other device.

Some people try to find any pathetic excuse to cry about Microsoft, I swear.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: Comment by ilovebeer
by Lorin on Sat 17th Nov 2012 05:20 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by ilovebeer"
Lorin Member since:
2010-04-06

I have a law degree and no matter what any shill says, the law does recognize that distinction and will act on it.

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[6]: Comment by ilovebeer
by lucas_maximus on Sat 17th Nov 2012 09:13 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by ilovebeer"
lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

Is this another one of you lies?

* Has a law degree
* Moved 200,000 desktops over to Linux.

Which is it?

Your resume is probably reading like a Character from Resident Evil.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Comment by ilovebeer
by lucas_maximus on Sat 17th Nov 2012 09:12 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by ilovebeer"
lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2012/11/why-the-8gb-wii-u-can-only-st...

Nothing has been said about Nintendo doing exactly the same thing.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[6]: Comment by ilovebeer
by kwan_e on Sat 17th Nov 2012 14:22 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by ilovebeer"
kwan_e Member since:
2007-02-18

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2012/11/why-the-8gb-wii-u-can-only-st...

Nothing has been said about Nintendo doing exactly the same thing.


You mean that article that was written in 15 Nov 2012?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Comment by ilovebeer
by segedunum on Sat 17th Nov 2012 16:43 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by ilovebeer"
segedunum Member since:
2005-07-06

I don't get your non-sensical argument I'm afraid. Whether it is Nintendo or anyone else that is still wrong.

I see you're trying to paint this as an anti-Microsoft thing or something now that you've lost all your (nonsensical) arguments.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Comment by ilovebeer
by segedunum on Sat 17th Nov 2012 16:42 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by ilovebeer"
segedunum Member since:
2005-07-06

No, ...it doesn't. The device DOES have 32GB of storage. Part of it is used by the OS. Just like every other device.

No. If you advertise a box with five cubic metres of space and you actually get two then the law has and can act on that kind of misrepresentation. You cannot argue that you do actually get that advertised storage but the walls of the box take up over 50% of it. It simply doesn't work like that.

I hate to burst the bubble of the non-sensical arguments you people are making but there have been umpteen legal precedents for this in many, many countries. It's as old as advertising itself.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Comment by ilovebeer
by lucas_maximus on Sat 17th Nov 2012 18:46 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by ilovebeer"
lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

Actually you don't seem to understand the meaning of nonsensical.

Nonsensical means without meaning or ludicrous.

What ilovebeer, you and I have are a difference of opinion. Before throwing phrases around, actually learn what they mean.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Comment by ilovebeer
by ilovebeer on Sun 18th Nov 2012 06:27 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by ilovebeer"
ilovebeer Member since:
2011-08-08

No, ...it doesn't. The device DOES have 32GB of storage. Part of it is used by the OS. Just like every other device.
No. If you advertise a box with five cubic metres of space and you actually get two then the law has and can act on that kind of misrepresentation. You cannot argue that you do actually get that advertised storage but the walls of the box take up over 50% of it. It simply doesn't work like that.

You're going to have to do a lot better than that to make any kind of point. Not only is the analogy terrible, I have yet to see a single law cited to support theories like yours.

I hate to burst the bubble of the non-sensical arguments you people are making but there have been umpteen legal precedents for this in many, many countries. It's as old as advertising itself.

If that is true, it should be absolutely no problem for you to start citing laws and successful lawsuits based on false advertisement of a product because how much actual "free space" was not clearly described in the advertisement.

Now you get the chance to prove there's any shred of truth to anything you've said. I'm going to warn you though, I expect to see citations of laws and/or cases that actually address the very issue you & others are whining about -- meaning don't waste anyones time citing some irrelevant bullshit and trying to force it to fit.

You hate Microsoft, I get it. But, this case is going nowhere and anyone with any common sense knows it.

Reply Parent Score: 2