Linked by Howard Fosdick on Fri 16th Nov 2012 07:43 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542861
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Comment by Thom_Holwerda
by WereCatf on Sat 17th Nov 2012 08:56
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Thom_Holwerda"
No. But SOME kind of injury (physical or otherwise) would seem to me to be necessary. What kind of injury did any of these things cause anyone?
I, personally, do not agree with that view. Not allowing women to vote, for example, never caused any injury to anyone, yet it was still certainly wrong, ie. things may certainly be unjustified and/or unfair without necessarily causing an injury of any kind.
RE[7]: Comment by Thom_Holwerda
by galvanash on Sat 17th Nov 2012 09:08
in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by Thom_Holwerda"
I, personally, do not agree with that view. Not allowing women to vote, for example, never caused any injury to anyone, yet it was still certainly wrong, ie. things may certainly be unjustified and/or unfair without necessarily causing an injury of any kind.
Not allowing a person the same rights as another because of their sex is most certainly injuring them, severely actually. I don't understand your analogy at all.
On the other hand, having to move your finger 3mm to the left when you talk on your phone (IF you have an already weak signal) certainly doesn't seem to me to be particularly bothersome... Certainly not worthy of a lawsuit.
RE[6]: Comment by Thom_Holwerda
by lucas_maximus on Sat 17th Nov 2012 09:00
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Thom_Holwerda"





Member since:
2006-01-25
No. But SOME kind of injury (physical or otherwise) would seem to me to be necessary. What kind of injury did any of these things cause anyone?
Edited 2012-11-17 08:47 UTC