To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Lets spell it out for you.
* The "buyer" who is a lawyer, could have easily found out (it is in the small print, which you should really always read), it putting up a class law suit ... instead of buying an SD card.
* The user (ahem... lawyer) is trying to make a name for himself. This is about consumer rights, it is blatantly about himself.
* These things have been around since companies have sold PCS.
* Other companies are doing it, and that hasn't been mentioned or raeged about ... mainly because it is Microsoft.
These are the same arguments I made, earlier and will continue to make.
If you asked me if I thought it was a bit shitty, I would agree and why I won't buy a surface at this time.
If you think it is unfair they don't advertise it more honestly ... maybe. But I am sorry, unless you are a smart consumer you will get ripped off.
All the information is available at your finger tips ... sorry there is simply no excuse.
Edited 2012-11-17 18:52 UTC
You're really, really not getting this, are you? I'm afraid small print does not exclude misleading advertising. That won't wash legally. Secondly a SD card is irrelevant because this is about the actual storage space of the device.
Your opinion.
Getting half the advertised storage? No, it hasn't. Seagate and WD actually got sued over that for a 5% discrepancy. Arguing that technology products have always been confusing for consumers is not an argument.
It doesn't make it right - as has been pointed out to you many times. Whinging that it's all anti-Microsoft is not a counter argument.
Yes, and they're the same arguments that have been shown to be nonsense. You repeat them because you don't have any counter arguments.
You've just made a case for misleading advertising there. Congratulations.
They aren't, and redefining what you advertise in terms and conditions won't work.
Edited 2012-11-19 13:13 UTC





Member since:
2005-07-06
I don't get your non-sensical argument I'm afraid. Whether it is Nintendo or anyone else that is still wrong.
I see you're trying to paint this as an anti-Microsoft thing or something now that you've lost all your (nonsensical) arguments.