Linked by Howard Fosdick on Fri 16th Nov 2012 07:43 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542939
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Is this now clear enough for you and Lucas to get?
No because you are wrong. "
http://www.osnews.com/thread?542950
Is that clear enough for you now?
Unfortunately that is about the reported size of the drive. This isn't the case and the same case law does not apply.
We are arguing that there is no false advertising because the size of the drive is correct, however the amount of space left is less, the available space is in the small print so it is a matter of opinion at the moment whether it can be deemed false advertising.
Unfortunately you and other in this thread have consistently failed to grasp that, while throwing insults around.
"[q]Is this now clear enough for you and Lucas to get?
No because you are wrong. "
http://www.osnews.com/thread?542950
Is that clear enough for you now? [/q]
The post you linked makes it clear that my "stupid dog" analogy is dead on. Read my reply to your linked post for more. Then feel free to respond again like a wounded animal.





Member since:
2009-08-18
No because you are wrong.