Linked by Howard Fosdick on Fri 23rd Nov 2012 14:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543038
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: The "Microsoft" effect.
by UltraZelda64 on Fri 23rd Nov 2012 16:59
in reply to "The "Microsoft" effect."
LOL... nice way to look at it. But Nokia is kind of different from the others you mentioned; in their case, they didn't just decide to go Microsoft-only. Mr. Head Dumbass Elop made the braindead decision to practically throw everything they had out and switch to Microsoft overnight. No sane businessman with any respect for his company or even his own public image would do that. I am still shocked at such a ridiculous move.
The other companies? Well... their dependence on Microsoft is just finally beginning to catch up with them and bite them in the ass, as ironically I have seen/heard being predicted probably a decade or more ago...
RE[2]: The "Microsoft" effect.
by chemical_scum on Fri 23rd Nov 2012 20:48
in reply to "RE: The "Microsoft" effect."
LOL... nice way to look at it. But Nokia is kind of different from the others you mentioned; in their case, they didn't just decide to go Microsoft-only. Mr. Head Dumbass Elop made the braindead decision to practically throw everything they had out and switch to Microsoft overnight.
Elop is not braindead, he is a deliberate wrecker sent in by MS to do the job. No OEM wanted to use Windows phone. Once Elop forces it onto Nokia all the other OEM's have to bring out a phone to compete and MS got its edge in the market. Now Nokia longer matters to them Elop can destroy it and arrange for MS to end up holding the patents. Just another MS saboteur and the Nokia board fell for it. No Elop is smart he has done his job and will be well rewarded for it. The Nokia board is braindead.
RE[2]: The "Microsoft" effect.
by zima on Sun 25th Nov 2012 08:44
in reply to "RE: The "Microsoft" effect."
Nokia is kind of different from the others you mentioned; in their case, they didn't just decide to go Microsoft-only. Mr. Head Dumbass Elop made the braindead decision to practically throw everything they had out and switch to Microsoft overnight. No sane businessman with any respect for his company or even his own public image would do that. I am still shocked at such a ridiculous move.
Series 40 OS is almost flourishing under Elop, finally rapidly moving forward after over half a decade of total stagnation. It's even starting to be described as a smartphone platform now (arguably, if we were to use any resemblance of rigorous definition, it was always more a smartphone than the iPhone in its first year). Series 30 handsets also undergo changes, advancements.
But I guess by now I'm not shocked that many critics don't really follow what Nokia did and is doing...
(also: http://www.osnews.com/permalink?543163 )
Edited 2012-11-25 08:52 UTC
RE: The "Microsoft" effect.
by ronaldst on Sat 24th Nov 2012 06:00
in reply to "The "Microsoft" effect."
RE: The "Microsoft" effect.
by zima on Sun 25th Nov 2012 08:37
in reply to "The "Microsoft" effect."
This is like a trend, every company that bases their busines model exclusively or almost exclusively on complementing Microsoft products is going down, like HP, AMD, Nokia, Dell and to some extent Intel.
Others have seen the danger beforehand and attempted to diversify, like NVidia with Tegra.
Others have seen the danger beforehand and attempted to diversify, like NVidia with Tegra.
Versus, what, computer manufacturers that didn't ally themselves with Microsoft? They are all long DEAD (Apple also allied themselves, if more loosely; but Macs are basically standard Wintel PCs hardware-wise, very much coming from MS-curated ecosystem)
Nokia was in hot water before MS. Intel is flourishing.
OTOH... are you implying that PowerPC is doing well? Zilog? MOS & Commodore?
Most of CPU or GFX manufacturers - also gone, MS or not; killed by competition from Intel, AMD, Nvidia, ATI.
And BTW HP tried to build a major part of their business on mobile Linux OS ...tried and failed; it possibly hastened their "demise"(?).
Lenovo is doing very fine BTW.
Edited 2012-11-25 08:45 UTC





Member since:
2006-02-25
This is like a trend, every company that bases their busines model exclusively or almost exclusively on complementing Microsoft products is going down, like HP, AMD, Nokia, Dell and to some extent Intel.
Others have seen the danger beforehand and attempted to diversify, like NVidia with Tegra.