Linked by Howard Fosdick on Fri 23rd Nov 2012 14:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543046
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: HP has a treasure, VMS, but HP seems trying to kill it
by johndoe445566 on Fri 23rd Nov 2012 20:34
in reply to "HP has a treasure, VMS, but HP seems trying to kill it"
RE[2]: HP has a treasure, VMS, but HP seems trying to kill it
by qunying on Sat 24th Nov 2012 01:27
in reply to "RE: HP has a treasure, VMS, but HP seems trying to kill it"
The sad truth is that an X64 version of OpenVMS wouldn't generate enough revenue to fund the development.
Maybe, but seems $11.1B has spent on a rubbish rather than improving its own product/service, the management board has serious problem.
VMS on Itenium is dead end.
Maybe Open source VMS will make its name OpenVMS really mean "open" in current sense, and they could build a community around it.




Member since:
2008-06-04
Actually I like VMS (OpenVMS), but the roadmap of it looks like HP going to kill it. HP refuses to port it over x86-64, latest version only runs over a dying processor only, the Itenium. And seems no further development for it either.
Edited 2012-11-23 19:15 UTC