Linked by Howard Fosdick on Sat 24th Nov 2012 04:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543119
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: RPi is still open-source hostile.
by WereCatf on Sat 24th Nov 2012 21:06
in reply to "RE[4]: RPi is still open-source hostile."
I wasn't talking about your mother, now was I? The fact is that USB 2.0 HDDs are terribly slow, limited to about 35MB/s speeds, and as such boards like this still wouldn't work for quite many people. Also, if we were talking about your mother she wouldn't need a quad-core CPU or GPU for mail and browsing anyways.
RE[6]: RPi is still open-source hostile.
by Aristocracies on Sat 24th Nov 2012 21:17
in reply to "RE[5]: RPi is still open-source hostile."
RE[6]: RPi is still open-source hostile.
by zima on Tue 27th Nov 2012 10:13
in reply to "RE[5]: RPi is still open-source hostile."
The fact is that USB 2.0 HDDs are terribly slow, limited to about 35MB/s speeds
Though "terribly slow" probably goes too far? Maybe "slowish" ...and OTOH quite enough for many other usages - reasonably comparable to 100 MBit Ethernet, when the little board is used to serving something over it.
PS. ( WRT http://www.osnews.com/permalink?543124 ) and with USB, CPU hardly idles when reading - USB is more CPU-intensive; maybe USB2.0-only is not such a bad thing on meagre CPUs.
Edited 2012-11-27 10:17 UTC





Member since:
2010-06-15
The eMMC port is still better than SDHC and whining about USB 2.0 as if that's make/break between my mother or other average people using it as a general purpose browser/email machine on a budget is hilarious. Thanks for the non-comment and your lack of vision.
Edited 2012-11-24 21:05 UTC