Linked by Howard Fosdick on Sat 24th Nov 2012 17:52 UTC
Editorial Do you depend on your computer for your living? If so, I'm sure you've thought long and hard about which hardware and software to use. I'd like to explain why I use generic "white boxes" running open source software. These give me a platform I rely on for 100% availability. They also provide a low-cost solution with excellent security and privacy.
Thread beginning with comment 543271
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: I couldn't agree more
by helf on Mon 26th Nov 2012 18:50 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: I couldn't agree more"
helf
Member since:
2005-07-06

You actually *can* do this with windows, I have done it numerous times.

Guess what, I did this with BeOS even longer ago.

No one cares. This shouldn't be a feature point on a chart. It should be assumed that a system is designed well enough to cope with such a change.

I just recently did the swapping to get both crunchbang and windows 7 installed on an old laptop of mine that doesnt support USB booting ;) "hurray".

Reply Parent Score: 2

lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

The problem is that it is pretended as though it is a Linux/*nix only trait.

When in fact any OS can be setup to do it. My criticism is not with the OS it is with the article that pretends that a major selling point of an alternative OS is this ... when it tbh it isn't.

Edited 2012-11-26 23:07 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[5]: I couldn't agree more
by helf on Mon 26th Nov 2012 23:09 in reply to "RE[4]: I couldn't agree more"
helf Member since:
2005-07-06

Exactly my point ;)

Reply Parent Score: 3