Linked by Howard Fosdick on Sat 24th Nov 2012 17:52 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543342
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Slashdot Circa 1999
by ze_jerkface on Wed 28th Nov 2012 18:46
in reply to "RE[3]: Slashdot Circa 1999"
Maybe RHEL is the standard in Linux servers, but their long term release is not the best choice for all the packages that form the RHEL distribution.
I think you and others here have taken my criticism as an attack on all non-RHEL distros.
RHEL/CENT is the top choice for web hosts and the best choice for low conflict risk for lamp servers. That doesn't make it the best distro by any means and in fact I haven't met anyone that actually likes it. RHEL is like the Windows 98 of Linux Distros. It's a safe choice for compatibility and support but it didn't win the top spot through technical merit.
Who told you upstream developers user RHEL in the first place. They usually use more lean and clean distributions (the lest fat, the better).
I'm talking about the commercial LAMP industry, not Linux developers in general. That industry targets the most common environment which is RHEL/CENT.




Member since:
2006-07-14
Again don't get defensive since all these annoying dependencies benefit Linux when it comes to web servers. It creates inertia and discourages stepping outside the norm.
Maybe RHEL is the standard in Linux servers, but their long term release is not the best choice for all the packages that form the RHEL distribution. Yes, a LTS Kernel/Core packages mean a stable system, but why I want backported patches to all the web apps it provides. They don't even trust that system on their own servers. For example, check in RHEL/CENTOS repository which version of Bugzilla they have available for install. I'm sure they don't have the last one, which in fact is the one currently running on their own bug tracking server.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
Also (and sorry if I get you down of that cloud), (1) Developers test against the upstream packages, that's why a package said it requires at least X.Y version, and (2) Who told you upstream developers user RHEL in the first place. They usually use more lean and clean distributions (the lest fat, the better).
Edited 2012-11-27 19:51 UTC