Linked by Howard Fosdick on Wed 28th Nov 2012 01:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543365
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: De-support isn't the only problem
by phoenix on Wed 28th Nov 2012 16:34
in reply to "De-support isn't the only problem"
RE[2]: De-support isn't the only problem
by benali72 on Wed 28th Nov 2012 19:25
in reply to "RE: De-support isn't the only problem"
RE: De-support isn't the only problem
by zima on Thu 29th Nov 2012 14:39
in reply to "De-support isn't the only problem"
If you really don't want to run MSE for whatever reason (you know, Microsoft essentially already has root access on your Win machine, via Windows Update) - NOD32 was always very light, suitable for older machines; F-Prot similar, IIRC; though both not free.
Avira was also rather light last time I used it, and free (but it seems it has some gotchas now http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avira#Problems )
Or you might always try http://clamsentinel.sourceforge.net/
RE: De-support isn't the only problem
by silviucc on Sat 1st Dec 2012 11:30
in reply to "De-support isn't the only problem"





Member since:
2008-05-03
I still have an old machine running XP. I'm not so concerned about the de-support as I am about running anti-malware on it. It's a uniprocessor P-4 that just doesn't have the horsepower to run most current anti-malware efficiently. Adaware and Avast! are examples. The thing can't run them with sufficient speed to make them practical.
Any ideas for other antimalware I can use (that has real-time support?)
I can run Malwarebytes and Clamwin but these do not have real-time support.