Linked by Howard Fosdick on Wed 28th Nov 2012 01:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543393
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.



Member since:
2010-01-21
Depends on your definition of "get rid of the Old hats...". Mind clarifying which old hats you're talking about?
1. The ones making platform design decisions that are hostile to closed-source software? Good luck finding any.
I've bought a ton of Humble Indie Bundles and some games off Desura and the only problem I've ever run into is situations where one game requires PulseAudio while another causes it to go crazy.
(And, 99% of the time, that was fixed by teaching the devs that PulseAudio isn't as universal and stable as lennartp told them and suggesting a wrapper like OpenAL instead. The other 1%, I run the Windows version in Wine... which is one of the things that causes PulseAudio to go nuts.)
2. Users who refuse to run closed-source software? Good luck with that.
I have a strict policy that, aside from games (which are too "disposable" to be refined slowly over a decade) the only closed-source allowed on my system is my BIOS (and BIOS != UEFI), my nVidia binary drivers, Flash (until H.264 vs. WebM is settled), Skype (until WebRTC matures), and the copy of Opera I use to test my creations.
...and I'm not an "old hat". I've only been running Linux since part-way through the WinXP lifecycle (less than 10 years) and demand open-source for the same reason I don't run Steam: I prefer to have the power to fix my own problems and hate companies having me by the balls.
3. Developers who refuse to write closed-source software for Linux because they think nobody will use it? I'm all for that.
Goodness knows there are enough old Humble Bundle games that only receive updates for the Windows and Mac ports because their devs don't give a damn.
Edited 2012-11-28 12:40 UTC