Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Nov 2012 16:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543439
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: they just dont get it
by grat on Wed 28th Nov 2012 20:03
in reply to "RE: they just dont get it"
RE[3]: they just dont get it
by Hiev on Wed 28th Nov 2012 20:30
in reply to "RE[2]: they just dont get it"
RE[2]: they just dont get it
by drcoldfoot on Wed 28th Nov 2012 20:16
in reply to "RE: they just dont get it"
And it's reasoning such as yours, that I believe Gnome3 seems to be such a failure. Of course the developers do the hard labor in an open source project. But without the userbase, there wouldn't be donations, nor distros and corporations that would invest in paid developers to keep the project going.
RE[3]: they just dont get it
by Hiev on Wed 28th Nov 2012 20:31
in reply to "RE[2]: they just dont get it"
RE[2]: they just dont get it
by TechGeek on Wed 28th Nov 2012 22:22
in reply to "RE: they just dont get it"
That problem is that the desktop is MINE, not theirs.
Then why don't you clone the git repository and start coding your self?
Then why don't you clone the git repository and start coding your self?
We, the users and devs, did. They are called Mate and Cinnamon. This is exactly the attitude that got Gnome into their current mess, with users and devs fleeing and forking. When a single set of decisions spawns two completely separate projects, you obviously aren't listening to your users.
RE[3]: they just dont get it
by Hiev on Wed 28th Nov 2012 22:32
in reply to "RE[2]: they just dont get it"





Member since:
2005-09-27
That problem is that the desktop is MINE, not theirs.
Then why don't you clone the git repository and start coding your self?
Edited 2012-11-28 19:49 UTC