Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Nov 2012 16:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543465
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-08-25
I believe that you're mistaken. I may not contribute code since I do not have the skillset. But I definitely contribute financially to projects that help me personally and within my place of employment. I also encourage my management to contribute financially to projects that the company depends on. And as such a contributor to a project, if the project, strays too far away from my use cases, then I will abandon all contributions in favor for a project that does. When enough users that financially contribute to a project leave, then the project dies. Since the Gnome project is user-centric, and deals heavily in the user experience, shouldn't the bulk of users have input in the project? This would be wise if they either financially contribute directly, or by proxy.