Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Nov 2012 17:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543584
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Actually, the Chromebook beats Intel (Atom) for most things in addition to battery life. Then again, that's Atom.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=samsung_exynos5_...
Actually, the Chromebook beats Intel (Atom) for most things in addition to battery life. Then again, that's Atom.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=samsung_exyn...
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=samsung_exyn...
Nice comparing Samsung's latest to Atoms released in 2008 (single core at that!) and 2010. Even so it barely bests the D525 in some tests. The i3, also from 2010 and now 2 generations behind beats it in every category.
Fact is, ARM isnt the magic processor people make it out to be.




Member since:
2012-09-21
Not knocking the price as the existing i5 tablets are >$1k. The only things that don't work for me is that it has a fan and probably mediocre battery life.
However, comparing it to a Nexus 4 + Nexus 7 + Chromebook is an obvious troll. None of these are close to being considered full featured computers and the ARM processor is still 3-4 years behind Intel on everything except battery life.