Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Nov 2012 15:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543635
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Also Windows has their equivalents to pretty much every security feature you could list of Linux.
If that were true, then Windows would have an equivalent security level for government use. It does not.
Windows cannot receive the same security rating as Linux, which is in a category shared by only one other system - Trusted Solaris - and reached by the Red Hat RHEL distribution, if not SuSe as well.





Member since:
2009-08-18
Well that was a lot of rubbish.
Pretty much everything you said may have been true until about 2003, which is almost 10 years ago now.
Also Windows has their equivalents to pretty much every security feature you could list of Linux.
Sorry ... keeping the firewall off is still dumb.
Also NT has always been designed as a multi-user OS, it just the desktop versions of Windows only allow one person logged it at a time (well that isn't really true anymore either).
Edited 2012-11-30 02:18 UTC