Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Nov 2012 15:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543710
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: The source of Microsoft's monopoly.
by lucas_maximus on Fri 30th Nov 2012 17:28
in reply to "RE[4]: The source of Microsoft's monopoly."
RE[6]: The source of Microsoft's monopoly.
by Lennie on Fri 30th Nov 2012 17:49
in reply to "RE[5]: The source of Microsoft's monopoly."





Member since:
2007-09-22
I don't agree on that, I think her point is:
copyright can stall innovation.
copyright was meant to give a someone for a limited time (8 years originally) the right to copy. Not the current 75-years after the death (!) of the author.
This gives no incentice for innovation.
Actually patents also are meant to improve the rate of innovation, but we know many, many examples especially in IT where this is not working and has the opposite affect.
So in that sense copyright and patents really are kind of in the same boot.