Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Dec 2012 09:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 544110
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Exactly, I'm not arguing with you at all. The costs pretty much show you why the figures are as they are, and why the SIII is so popular. It's a third cheaper over 2 years.
It's Google's strategy, really. Make smartphones super-cheap. It's working, and sadly, I don't think the market benefits from it.





Member since:
2005-06-29
Of course it doesn't. Who said so?