Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Dec 2012 23:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 544249
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Correction: Hold your horses. Not really "truely open"
by kragil on Wed 5th Dec 2012 10:53
in reply to "RE: Correction: Hold your horses. Not really "truely open""
That are just delay tactics to appease the unwashed Twitter masses.
In a more private setting they clearly said that the UI will stay proprietary:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-M1VRuYO1bU
There is also an interview with the CEO or someone saying the same ... but I can't be bothered to find it.
RE[3]: Correction: Hold your horses. Not really "truely open"
by masennus on Wed 5th Dec 2012 11:58
in reply to "RE[2]: Correction: Hold your horses. Not really "truely open""
RE[3]: Correction: Hold your horses. Not really "truely open"
by shmerl on Wed 5th Dec 2012 18:27
in reply to "RE[2]: Correction: Hold your horses. Not really "truely open""





Member since:
2010-06-08
This is incorrect. Jolla are still deciding how open their UI should be. See this discussion for example:
https://lwn.net/Articles/526935/ (or if they finished deciding, they didn't publish any further details yet).
In the best case it can be fully open. Their further plans are to make the UI swappable, so you could install fully open Nemo UX on top of the common middleware for example with Sailfish (they already basically share Mer Core + Nemo middleware).
See also: https://wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Zephyr (which is a future direction of Nemo and potentially Sailfish).
Edited 2012-12-05 03:13 UTC