Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Dec 2012 16:56 UTC, submitted by estherschindler
X11, Window Managers "For two decades, X has been the foundation for Linux graphics. Ubuntu's decision late in 2010 to switch to Wayland shakes things up all the way to those roots. Just over a month ago, the official 1.0.0 release of Wayland appeared, as well as its associated Weston project. How will these milestones affect working GUI programmers? What will happen to all the existing toolkits - Qt, wxWindows, Tk, and others - on which so many graphical applications already depend?"
Thread beginning with comment 544310
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: fluid rendering
by BluenoseJake on Wed 5th Dec 2012 18:22 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: fluid rendering"
BluenoseJake
Member since:
2005-08-11

I don't think there was ever a need for NVidia cards...

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: fluid rendering
by shmerl on Wed 5th Dec 2012 18:35 in reply to "RE[3]: fluid rendering"
shmerl Member since:
2010-06-08

Really? Intel GPUs were horrible with anything related to gaming. Not sure if it improved lately, but without Nvidia any graphics intense game wouldn't work.

Edited 2012-12-05 18:36 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: fluid rendering
by BluenoseJake on Thu 6th Dec 2012 12:11 in reply to "RE[4]: fluid rendering"
BluenoseJake Member since:
2005-08-11

AMD cards work fine, and intel for light duty, I just prefer AMD.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: fluid rendering
by bnolsen on Wed 5th Dec 2012 18:54 in reply to "RE[3]: fluid rendering"
bnolsen Member since:
2006-01-06

Well they are better than gma500 (powervr) based intel video.

Reply Parent Score: 3