Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 6th Dec 2012 05:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 544396
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
As you've already mentioned, regular user pays "MS tax" [or Apple tax] anyway. Isn't it better to pay this tax as an extra cost of the hardware? OS is free [as in cost] anyway, so you don't really loose that much. In fact, you gain freedom, independence, etc.
I think it's worth the game. Besides: we don't buy computers THAT often. And we don't HAVE TO buy them that often - FLOSS doesn't make you upgrade everytime there's new version of some software package.
we don't buy computers THAT often. And we don't HAVE TO buy them that often - FLOSS doesn't make you upgrade everytime there's new version of some software package.
That's not really the case, FLOSS also participates in update treadmill, you're expected to run the latest versions (which might not work that well on old hardware).
Firefox even requires more powerful GPUs (for GPGPU use) on Linux than on Windows, for the same effect. Driver situation doesn't help...
Meanwhile Opera (closed software) is lighter, better suited for really old computers. Opera Mini gives good web access to millions of basic feature phones - while Mozilla said, after two abortive attempts, ~"we'll wait for better hardware"




Member since:
2010-03-11
I looked at a bunch of Linux cert and Linux pre-installed options recently. They were all quite a bit more expensive than buying a computer with Windows and wiping the drive. Ranging in price difference from 50% up to 300%. With the price factor so much against Linux it's much more appealing for most consumers to simply pay the MS tax.