Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 6th Dec 2012 05:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 544550
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Comment by kaiwai
by moondevil on Sat 8th Dec 2012 08:00
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by kaiwai"
Yes, but this is what the community was discussing all along when it was announced.
As always there were the cries of saying that some people were exaggerating, well now reality proves once again, how true those warnings were.
As always there were the cries of saying that some people were exaggerating, well now reality proves once again, how true those warnings were.
How is it Microsoft's fault that the community are too lazy to actually find out what the certification process actually means? nothing has been proven other than a buggy firmware can result in an end user with a non-Microsoft operating system having a crappy time. Sorry but join the line of pissed off end users who have buggy firmware resulting in them having a 'bad time'.




Member since:
2005-07-06
The certification process says nothing about whether a particular piece of firmware is buggy or not. It is one thing to say, "must have this feature" and another thing to say as part of the certification process, "oh, and btw make sure your firmware isn't buggy as hell to the point that non-MS operating systems cannot run".