Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Dec 2012 23:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 544646
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by Luminair
by Luminair on Tue 11th Dec 2012 16:23
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Luminair"
RE[5]: Comment by Luminair
by Morgan on Tue 11th Dec 2012 16:30
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Luminair"
I don't get you. You seem to want Valve to build a $1000+ gaming rig but sell it for less than a last-gen console. You set the bar so high no one would be able to succeed.
I definitely get the impression that Valve has somehow pissed you off, or that at the very least you don't like Steam or even gaming in general. I'm a casual gamer myself, but I think something unique like this would be a boon to both the console gaming arena and to GNU/Linux itself. I could be wrong of course, but I'm not going to hold the company to an expectation that no one out there, including the established players, could meet.





Member since:
2005-06-29
Do you know something the rest of us don't? I can build a pretty fast gaming box for under $300 that will play any current Steam game very well, and that's with retail priced parts. Now enter Valve, who can put together a deal to get the hardware far below retail costs. You'll either have a kick-ass console for the same price, sold as a loss leader, or else a very capable console with a slim profit line of its own.
I really don't understand why you refuse to acknowledge the possibility that Valve can do this and do it well. It's almost as if you have a personal grudge.