Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Dec 2012 23:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 544831
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: All who bash Ubuntu...
by lucas_maximus on Wed 12th Dec 2012 18:04
in reply to "RE[3]: All who bash Ubuntu..."
RE[5]: All who bash Ubuntu...
by r_a_trip on Wed 12th Dec 2012 20:00
in reply to "RE[4]: All who bash Ubuntu..."
RE[4]: All who bash Ubuntu...
by zima on Sun 16th Dec 2012 13:52
in reply to "RE[3]: All who bash Ubuntu..."
or slip further into irrelevance.
I criticize because I still care. Once I go quiet, it is Canonical who?
I criticize because I still care. Once I go quiet, it is Canonical who?
"Slip further into irrelevance"? One decent set of stats shows Ubuntu to be the only desktop Linux that really grows: http://stats.wikimedia.org/archive/squid_reports/2012-10/SquidRepor... (vs a year ago http://stats.wikimedia.org/archive/squid_reports/2011-10/SquidRepor... - all other notable desktop distros decreased in the same period)
Once you go quiet, hardly anybody will notice; Ubuntu will likely continue its rise.
Edited 2012-12-16 13:54 UTC





Member since:
2005-07-06
The way they go about getting money now is sleazy. They better drum up some legitimate business or slip further into irrelevance.
I criticize because I still care. Once I go quiet, it is Canonical who?
One more thing:
But it is a common practice those days to earn your money by advertisements.
Yeah, that everybody is doing it (or trying to), doesn't make it an ok thing to do.
Edited 2012-12-12 16:11 UTC