Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Dec 2012 22:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 544895
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Zaitch
by fmaxwell on Sat 15th Dec 2012 04:30
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Zaitch"
"Point stands. I don't care if my kid finds pictures of naked men or women. Big whoop.
I find violence a far bigger issue.
I find violence a far bigger issue.
Then presumably you should be giving a cautious welcome to the updated image search. It's trivially easy to find content that qualifies as both pornographic *and* graphically violent. "
I'll take your word for it.
But that's like arguing that people who dislike fast cars should rejoice about the Google porn filtering because it's trivially easy to find nude women posing with fast cars.
RE[4]: Comment by Zaitch
by BeamishBoy on Sat 15th Dec 2012 18:46
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Zaitch"
But that's like arguing that people who dislike fast cars should rejoice about the Google porn filtering because it's trivially easy to find nude women posing with fast cars.
No, it's not. It's not like that at all.
If you're too stupid to see the distinction, content filters are almost certainly the least of your worries.





Member since:
2010-10-27
I find violence a far bigger issue.
Then presumably you should be giving a cautious welcome to the updated image search. It's trivially easy to find content that qualifies as both pornographic *and* graphically violent.