To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well they actually could, anyone looking to make their own unlicensed x86 based CPU can already start at the i586 iirc, theres a little known x86 manufacturer called Xcore86 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xcore86 that produces 1Ghz i586 based SoCs with DDR2 and PCIe support.
The board looks pretty interesting http://www.vortex86dx.com/?page_id=286
Reminds me of the AMD Geode based thin client I have in the closet. 16MB of onboard storage with no upgrade path there (proprietary flash based "disk") so it's limited to a 2.4 series Linux based OS, or its original WinCE software.
For a time I had Tiny Core Linux running on it, and it was very fast for what it was. But it had no practical use once I got my first Raspberry Pi so now it collects dust.
Yeah, that would be too soon - only 2 or 3 years ago Intel was still selling 32bit CPUs (netbook Atoms); not sure if all mobile Atoms (in phones running Android) are 64 bit...
Then there's also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X32_ABI & https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/ project, apparently from Intel (for mobile phone Atoms?), which I guess depends somewhat on the continuing existence of 32bit x86 support in Linux.




Member since:
2006-05-20
I absolutely think this is the right move. While support for old machines is definitely an advantage for Linux, is anybody actually trying to boot a modern distro like Ubuntu or Fedora on a 386? No! Anybody who needs a machine that old for some reason does not also need the most modern software. I wouldn't mind if they dropped 486 support. We're coming up on 20 years since the introduction of the Pentium. Naturally, there will be a very vocal minority that feels removing 486 support signifies the start of the apocalypse, but I think the actual re-world impact of such a move would be negligible.