Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Dec 2012 21:47 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 544910
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by lucas_maximus
by OSbunny on Thu 13th Dec 2012 00:44
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by lucas_maximus"
RE[5]: Comment by lucas_maximus
by lucas_maximus on Thu 13th Dec 2012 00:46
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by lucas_maximus"
RE[4]: Comment by lucas_maximus
by gagol on Thu 13th Dec 2012 00:55
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by lucas_maximus"
RE[4]: Comment by lucas_maximus
by tylerdurden on Thu 13th Dec 2012 01:19
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by lucas_maximus"
Well, you claimed that there were a lot of developers using these chips. Which is silly, since Those CPUs had not been produced for over 5 years. And for the most part intel was not really making new 386/486s as much as they were clearing out inventory, that they had to keep due sourcing clauses from contracts with military/gov clients.
No one in their right mind would run a modern 3.x Linux kernel on a 386 part anyway.
PS. I did not downvote you btw.
RE[4]: Comment by lucas_maximus
by dnebdal on Thu 13th Dec 2012 18:52
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by lucas_maximus"
RE[4]: Comment by lucas_maximus
by segedunum on Fri 14th Dec 2012 12:36
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by lucas_maximus"
RE[5]: Comment by lucas_maximus
by lucas_maximus on Sat 15th Dec 2012 06:48
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by lucas_maximus"





Member since:
2009-08-18
I love OSNEWS, get downvoted for stating the following:
* That these old CPUs were used in embedded devices.
* That there are a lot still in existence that may still need support.
FFS