Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Dec 2012 19:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 544929
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Hate to be Tech Support for that store
by henderson101 on Thu 13th Dec 2012 10:22
in reply to "RE[2]: Hate to be Tech Support for that store"
Originally, yes - not since NT4. NT4 took the UI out of user space and put it in the Kernel, and so in doing, made portability much more involved. Up to NT3.51, it was designed so that every subsystem could be replaced easily - this is where a lot of the "NT is highly portable" comes from. e.g. NT hasn't run on PowerPC, DEC etc, *since* NT 4 was released. Any later port would have been a larger undertaking than "just recompiling the kernel and creating a new HAL".
RE[4]: Hate to be Tech Support for that store
by zima on Thu 13th Dec 2012 18:02
in reply to "RE[3]: Hate to be Tech Support for that store"





Member since:
2009-03-17
Yes and no. The NT kernel was designed/built with portability in mind from the get go. Microsoft never got their act together (with regards to portability) when it comes to the user/application space, however.