Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Dec 2012 23:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 544945
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Nelson,
I don't have a problem with apple deciding the rules for their application store, none what-so-ever. What I do have a problem with is apple dictating what consumers can do on devices that were supposed to have rights transferred to the owner at the point of sale. DRM enables apple to extend it's control onto devices it no longer legally owns, which is immoral.
I'm hoping the more progressive EU countrymen will step up and set things right. You're the only hope because US politicians are all on corporate leashes.
Edited 2012-12-13 05:48 UTC
RE[2]: It's Apple's Sandbox
by Nelson on Thu 13th Dec 2012 06:20
in reply to "RE: It's Apple's Sandbox"
I don't have a problem with apple deciding the rules for their application store, none what-so-ever. What I do have a problem with is apple dictating what consumers can do on devices that were supposed to have rights transferred to the owner at the point of sale. DRM enables apple to extend it's control onto devices it no longer legally owns, which is immoral.
I don't think we're reading the same article, because DRM is mentioned no where in this article.
My enthusiasm about letting you be a pedant is probably right up there with getting a root canal.





Member since:
2005-11-29
They decide the rules, and it is important they apply them in a somewhat uniformly manner.
That said, I feel like their limitation is ridiculous and they're the only app store that does it (afaik). I don't care much for iOS, but Microsoft is put in an interesting position.
Of course, it'd be hilarious and the shoe was on the other foot and Microsoft was charging Apple 30% of revenue of a hypothetical Metro iTunes client.