Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Dec 2012 22:03 UTC
Google A change to anything related to Google Search - the product so many of us rely on - is never going to go by unnotoced. This time around, Google has altered Image Search for US users to alter the way it handles that ever so important aspect of the web - adult content.
Thread beginning with comment 545012
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: About time
by Gone fishing on Thu 13th Dec 2012 11:43 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: About time"
Gone fishing
Member since:
2006-02-22

.(3) I'd never think to use that term to search for sex related issues. It's not the usual word we use in the UK. I'd actually use minge, vag, fanny, c*nt or twat (though twat is more used as an insult.)
(4)


Odd your English and you think c*nt is so obscene you censored it.

Sorry after posting I find it was OSnews

Thom OSnews is censoring C.U.N.T


Edited 2012-12-13 11:47 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[4]: About time
by UltraZelda64 on Thu 13th Dec 2012 21:35 in reply to "RE[3]: About time"
UltraZelda64 Member since:
2006-12-05

What's odd is how you can type a "forbidden" word and post it uncensored here at OSNews, but if you made a mistake and had to edit the post the word will then be censored. So if you want that word to remain uncensored, you have to leave the original post untouched.

Edited 2012-12-13 21:36 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: About time
by henderson101 on Thu 13th Dec 2012 22:17 in reply to "RE[3]: About time"
henderson101 Member since:
2006-05-30

c*nt <- a test

Oh yes - if you edit the comment, it self censors. Weird! Retrospective prudism? It also loses any capitalisation!

Edited 2012-12-13 22:19 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: About time
by henderson101 on Thu 13th Dec 2012 22:20 in reply to "RE[4]: About time"
henderson101 Member since:
2006-05-30

But if I post a new comment, cunt will be visible?

Reply Parent Score: 2