Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Dec 2012 23:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545032
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Apple should be less motivated grabbing money from companies who increase the value of Apple's iOS ecosystem."
Companies who greatly benefit from iOS ecosystem.
This is just business and don't forget that there is an easy solution by not providing in-app purchase which should not be a real problem in this case for Office.





Member since:
2011-05-12
I don't think Microsoft should get special treatment, but I do think 30% is a lot of money for what Apple gives in return.
If it's apps and app extensions I can understand, because that's code hosted on Apple's servers. Subscriptions aren't. These are costs for who ever is providing a service to subscribers. In this case Microsoft and they need to cover these costs and make a profit, which is hard to do if someone grabs 30% and doesn't give anything in return.
Also 30% is relative. Of $1 it's 30 cents, but of $30 it's $10. Why not use 30% and hard cap it at $2? Or $4, $5?
The more stuff is in the app store the more appealing iOS devices will become. Apple should be less motivated grabbing money from companies who increase the value of Apple's iOS ecosystem.