Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Dec 2012 19:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545056
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
The difference is that Apple invested the time and money in building a universal binary system.
That's a bit unfair. The difference is more nuanced... PPC->x86 of Apple was within the same kind of devices (PPC desktops & laptops -> x86 desktops and laptops). The universal binaries don't encompass Apple mobile devices.
And that's the jump MS is doing, desktops & laptops -> mobile.